From what we have been told, an Intactivist is a human rights fighter. A person who stands up for infant boys' rights to decide whether or not they want to be circumcised.
What we have found is that although there are some Intactivists who truly do have childrens' well-being at heart, while there are Intactivists who seem to be reasonable individuals....well, for every one of those Intactivists there is at least two hate-filled, raging lunatics behind them.
These lunatics harass individuals who have the audacity to speak their own opinion. They harass individuals who don't have an opinion at all. They threaten people's professions, they demand coroner's reports on children who have died of issues unrelated to circumcision at all, they do not know when to stop.
What is the purpose of our blog? Our purpose is to expose these Intactivists using evidence from the Internet. Anything that we post will either have been on the Internet and been saved prior to being removed or it will be evidence that is still on the Internet.
We have nothing to hide. It's all there.
So let's begin, shall we?
can't wait to see you reveal the terrorist for who they are!!!!
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteHello,
ReplyDeleteJen is not the only author/moderator of this blog.
We do not entertain anonymous posts. At this time, our page is open to posts without prior approval, but if we feel the need to change that we will.
While we are open to comments, we will not engage in long, drawn-out, never-ending debate. We will not accept "evidence" supporting the intactivist cause that is written by intactivists. We consider that biased "evidence". If "evidence" is not unbiased then we do not consider it so.
Any attacks such as name-calling, accusing us of "advocating for hurting babies", or degrading comments will not only be removed but will also be reported. Threats will not only be reported but will be documented and pursued to the highest degree.
While intactivists have their own pages and blogs that they use as a means of "calling in the troops" and then harassing people, our blog does not serve that purpose. We find it very suspicious that a site that did this last week now has tried to force Jen to not be able to use the word ERIC and not be able to use any of the information from that site. Notice we said "tried". Any information on the internet, according to the hoards of harassers last week, is fair game and open to argument and abuse, correct?
So the answer to your question is that if you wish to comment you need to do it with your name. We will go from there.
Thanks.
Howdy guys, I attempted to email you, but your email no longer works. Maybe you won't even see this comment. I'm hoping you do. I'm trying to contact you.
ReplyDelete